HDTutorial
EN

Playback starts YouTube’s embedded player (privacy-enhanced mode).

How to change a Windows Screen Mosquito Netting (Amido) Net Window: do it yourself

11,568 views October 28, 2012 6:02

Watch on YouTube
Channeltimtak1

Description from the creator

Mr. Mikami of the Yamaguchi Silver Employment Centre (ysjc.or.jp/ ) demonstrates how to change a net window for a Japanese house.

The Wood Pricks keep spamming me. Please stop it.

It is important to put the rubber strip in in a clockwise direction.

Note that when Mr. Mikami introduces himself, he starts with his affiliation as polite Japanese gentlemen do (Nakane, 1970, p2-3, in, Hasegawa & Hirose, 2005, p222).

Here is the quote from Nakane (1970) describing Mr. Mikami's self introduction perfectly.
This ready tendency of the Japanese to stress situational position in a particular frame, rather than universal attribute can be seen in the following example; when a Japanese ' faces the outside' (confronts another person) and affixes some position to himself socially he is inclined to give precedence to institution over kind of occupation. Rather than saying, "I am a type-setter' or 'I am a filing clerk,' he is likely to say, 'I am from B Publishing Group' or 'I belong to S Company'. p2-3

The great part about this is (although she does go on to backtrack in rest of the same paragraph) that both the "attribute" and the "institution" (which Nakane has earlier defined as a "frame" or "ba") are both described as being social positions. Nakane is spot on. Westerners can loose track of the fact that they are defining themselves socially when they use "universal attributes" because it can seem as if they are not expressing membership of a group but rather something specific to themselves.

Other than Nakane's opinion that both are social positions, how should one decide? One way would be to examine the commonality of these self definitions. If one picked 100 Japanese and 100 Americans and asked them for self-definitions, who would give the more overlapping self-definitions, the "frame" mentioning Japanese or the "attribute" mentioning Americans. This is exactly what I did in one of my few social psychology papers (Takemoto ne Leuers & Sonoda, 1999). The results showed that the self descriptions of Americans that overlap more than those of Japanese, and are therefore, though attributional, more social.

Hasegawa, Y., & Hirose, Y. (2005). What the Japanese Language Tells Us about the Alleged Japanese Relational Self. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 25(2), 219--251. doi:10.1080/07268600500233019 Retrieved 2012/4/12 from hasegawa.berkeley.edu/Papers/Self.pdf
Leuers, T. R. S., & Sonoda, N. (1999). Independent self bias. Progress in asian social psychology, 3, 87--104. Retrieved 2012/4/13 from nihonbunka.com/docs/independent_self.rtf
Nakane, C. (1972). Japanese Society (1st pb ed.). University of California Press.

About this tutorial

timtak1 published this 6:02 video tutorial on October 28, 2012. It has been watched 11,568 times on YouTube.

Channel
timtak1
Duration
6:02
Published
October 28, 2012
Views
11,568
Likes
95

Tags

Share

This tutorial in other languages